Renewable, safe energy key in N.H.
By Jesse J.
DeConto
PORTSMOUTH -
The governor asked for input as the state develops a 10-year energy plan, and
Seacoast residents responded Thursday by saying the next decade should look
much different from the past 100 when it comes to how New Hampshire residents
produce and use energy.
Representatives
of the Governor's Office of Energy and Community Services held a public forum
on the New Hampshire State Energy Plan at Portsmouth City Hall on Thursday.
"Our
energy past is one of dirty, dangerous, unhealthy energy sources," said
Dover resident Jim Sconyers, who like the other speakers called for ending
reliance on nuclear power and fossil fuels.
"Energy
sources must be good for the people and other living things in New
Hampshire," said Sconyers. "The technology already exists. What's
missing is the public will."
Transportation
accounts for almost half of the state's energy use, and personal automobiles
use about 80 percent of transport fuel burned in the state, according to the
Office of Energy and Community Services.
"We might
imagine that it's mostly an issue of industry," said Greg Norris,
president of Sylvatica, Inc., a company hired by the state to help plot New
Hampshire's energy use. "Sorry, folks, it's us."
Portsmouth
resident Ned Raynolds, whom the Herald recently featured in a story about hybrid-electric
vehicles, is policy outreach manager for the Northeast Energy Efficiency
Partnership.
If "a
penny saved is a penny earned," Raynolds argued that energy saved is
energy earned.
"Energy
efficiency is, without question, the most cost-effective indigenous energy
resource the state has," he said.
He urged the
state government to pursue efficiency in its own infrastructure and to help
low-income residents and small-business entrepreneurs to make their own homes,
offices and factories as efficient as possible.
"The
greatest cost savings potential for energy efficiency comes when a building is
constructed," said Raynolds, who has lobbied the city of Portsmouth to
build efficiency into the renovated high school and new library buildings,
projects that will soon be under way.
Chris Nord, an
Exeter building contractor who specializes in efficient construction, chided
the state government for subsidizing fossil fuel plants by not making them
accountable for the health impact of their emissions.
"We're
involved in corporate socialism," said Nord. "The free market is
necessarily short-sighted because corporate earnings do not necessarily equate
with the public good."
Nord cited two
studies in Massachusetts linking living near a nuclear reactor to an increase
in cancer. Massachusetts towns within 10 miles of Seabrook Station have
radiation monitors, but 17 New Hampshire towns within that radius do not.
"It's
always been amazing to me that we don't have monitoring in this state,"
said Nord.
Martin Cameron
of the Portsmouth Neighborhood Association agreed. Cameron specialized in
chemical, biological and radiological warfare during the Cold War, and he
discussed the damage nuclear radiation can do.
"The
greatest responsibility of a government is to protect its citizens," he
said. "I think the state of New Hampshire is failing its people in the
southeastern coast area."
Jennifer Hicks of the Seacoast Anti-Pollution League echoed Cameron's
complaints about Seabrook.
"This is
one of the largest risks in the Seacoast just by the fact that it exists,"
she said. "Just being near it could be a health hazard."
Hicks had
similar criticism of the state's oil-burning electric power plants in Bow,
Newington and Portsmouth.
"Yeah,
they're cheap to run. But they're actually very expensive plants because of the
health impact to residents."
Gov. Jeanne
Shaheen recently signed into law a Clean Power Act forcing those electricity
plants to cut emissions.
Doug Bogen, of
Clean Water Action, lamented that this legislation does not apply to natural
gas plants. "We need to stop subsidizing the old, smelly, dirty power
sources," said Bogen. "We may have the least environmentally sound
energy regime in New England."